ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2026
Acid-sensing ion channels in ischemic stroke: amplifying and constraining neuronal injury in a phase-specific framework.
Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For decades, ischemic neuronal death was understood largely as a story about glutamate. Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) have revised that account. When cerebral blood flow stops, the penumbra can develop prolonged extracellular acidosis, and experimental studies implicate ASIC1a in mediating sufficient Ca²⁺ entry to injure neurons even when glutamate receptors are blocked, a contribution shaped by channel expression, subunit composition, and the intracellular signaling context. However, sustained acidosis does not necessarily imply sustained channel opening, given ASIC1a desensitization. Besides acidosis, glutamate, polyamines, a paradoxical intracellular alkalization, and oxidative stress can enhance ASIC1a activity or expression, and the channel also signals through a non-conducting route, recruiting RIPK1 to trigger necroptosis independently of ion flux. The relative contributions of these conducting and non-conducting mechanisms in vivo remain incompletely defined. Endogenous mechanisms may constrain injury by internalizing the channel, altering subunit expression, including conditioning-associated ASIC2a upregulation, and degrading ASIC1a through estrogen signaling. We argue that these responses are better understood as constraints on injury than as a genuine survival program, a distinction with mechanistic and therapeutic consequences. Critically, the contribution of these mechanisms may vary over time. The same channel acts as a target of homeostatic regulation before stroke, a driver of death during ischemia, a potential target at reperfusion when acidosis persists but restored flow finally permits drug delivery, and an impediment to repair for weeks afterward. The question in ASIC-targeted neuroprotection is not only whether to inhibit the channel, but also when and for how long.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42850478What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.