SynthesisEndocrinology, diabetes & metabolism2026
Comparison of Clinical, Metabolic, and Hormonal Profiles in Obese Versus Lean Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionObesity substantially influences clinical and metabolic manifestations of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). However, differences in clinical, metabolic, and hormonal profiles between obese and lean women with PCOS have not been explored in large-scale meta-analyses.
methodsDatabases were searched from inception through 31 December 2025 for studies reporting clinical, metabolic, and hormonal profiles in obese and lean PCOS phenotypes. Random-effects meta-analyses in R yielded mean differences (MDs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals.
resultsForty-two studies (N = 5363; 3078 obese, 2285 lean PCOS) met inclusion criteria. Menstrual irregularity (84.7% vs. 70.9%; RR 1.19), hirsutism (65.9% vs. 58.8%; RR 1.10), acne (44.9% vs. 36.8%; RR 1.25), acanthosis nigricans (52.7% vs. 22.6%; RR 1.94), and biochemical hyperandrogenism (45.6% vs. 31.8%; RR 1.49) were more prevalent in obese than in lean PCOS. Obese PCOS was associated with a less favourable cardiometabolic profile, with higher HOMA-IR (MD 2.03), fasting (MD 5.12 mg/dL), and 2-h (MD 9.91 mg/dL) plasma glucose, and greater risks of prediabetes (25.3% vs. 12.1%; RR 1.84), diabetes (8.6% vs. 2.7%; RR 2.58), and metabolic syndrome (51.2% vs. 11.9%; RR 3.59). Mean lipid levels were worse in obese PCOS, with higher total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol, and lower HDL cholesterol. Nonetheless, lean PCOS exhibited substantial burdens of menstrual dysfunction, hyperandrogenism, insulin resistance, dysglycemia, and dyslipidemia.
conclusionObesity in PCOS is associated with more severe reproductive, metabolic, and hormonal abnormalities, but lean PCOS still carries substantial reproductive and metabolic burdens. However, the observational design of the included studies and substantial heterogeneity across several outcomes warrant cautious interpretation.
trial registrationThe meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO under registration number CRD420251240521. The review protocol summary is available on the PROSPERO website.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42850789What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.