Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42851728›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Curriculum evolution and documentary evidence of competency alignment in a hospital-embedded undergraduate health services and management programme in China: a longitudinal case study.

Jin Tian, Liang Dong, Yuchang Li, Lejiao An, Liang Sun, Zengren Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jin Tian *Hospital Management Innovation Research Center, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Liang Dong *Department of Healthcare-Associated Infection Control, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yuchang LiHospital Management Innovation Research Center, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Lejiao AnDepartment of Healthcare-Associated Infection Control, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Liang SunOffice of the President, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Zengren ZhaoHospital Management Innovation Research Center, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Undergraduate Health Services and Management (HSM) programmes are expected to integrate management, medicine, public health, digital capability and workplace learning. Hospital-embedded delivery may provide access to authentic organizational settings and interdisciplinary expertise, but distributed teaching can fragment curriculum ownership, competency progression and assessment. This study examined longitudinal evolution and documentary evidence of competency alignment in a hospital-embedded undergraduate HSM programme in China. Methods: A longitudinal document analysis and competency-oriented curriculum-mapping case study was conducted from programme approval in 2020 to first-cohort graduation in 2026. Of 18 unique materials assessed, 15 programme-specific documents formed the empirical corpus, including original and revised training plans, course and teaching-unit records, faculty-development materials, internship documents, quality-assurance instruments and aggregate graduate-destination data. Documentary evidence was assessed using 33 indicators across seven domains and traced through five analytical stages: stated, curricularised, practiced, assessed and fed back. Each indicator was rated as explicitly represented, partially represented or not identified. A second reviewer independently rescored all indicators. Results: Graduation requirements increased from 165 to 184.5 credits, required courses from 47 to 55, and five elective courses were listed in the revised plan. Management was positioned more clearly as a principal discipline, while biomedical, digital-health and artificial-intelligence content expanded. The 40-week internship covered hospital, public-health, community and industry settings and specified activity requirements, but no programme-wide cross-placement competency rubric was identified. Of 33 indicators, 11 (33.3%) were explicitly represented, 21 (63.6%) were partially represented and one (3.0%) lacked identifiable documentary evidence. Practice education showed the strongest documentary representation, whereas longitudinal digital-health competency development, programme-level assessment and completed feedback cycles were less fully documented. Reviewers agreed on 31 of 33 ratings (93.9%), with a quadratic-weighted Cohen's kappa of 0.893. Conclusions: Hospital embedding provided documented access to interdisciplinary teaching resources and diverse workplace-learning settings, but evidence of coherent competency progression, comparable assessment across settings, applied digital-health learning and completed feedback cycles remained limited. Curriculum ownership, longitudinal competency mapping, common assessment mechanisms and systematic feedback may help strengthen programme coherence. We propose a provisional, case-derived resource-to-capability conversion framework for further investigation in distributed professional programmes.

Indexed as

Competency-Based EducationCurriculumChinaClinical CompetenceHumansLongitudinal Studiescompetency alignmentcurriculum governancecurriculum mappinghealth services and managementhospital-embedded educationpractice education

Identifiers

PMID42851728
PMCPMC13646136

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.