ArticleCureus2026
Partial Alignment of Electrocardiographic Subspaces Associated With Obesity and Heart Failure in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Obesity and heart failure are each associated with electrocardiographic remodeling, but it is unknown whether their multidimensional electrical phenotypes share common directions within a feature space. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of historical Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data (1988-1994) from 8,324 adults aged 40 years or older with complete data on obesity, self-reported physician-diagnosed heart failure, survey design variables, and resting 12-lead electrocardiography. Forty-seven features were adjusted for age, sex, and race/ethnicity, standardized, and transformed using covariance whitening relative to nonobese participants without heart failure. Across 30 repeated analyses that preserved the survey design and used one half of the sample, we estimated two-dimensional subspaces based on excess second moments. The obesity subspace was derived from obese participants without heart failure, and the heart failure subspace was derived from nonobese participants with heart failure. The primary statistic was the mean squared canonical cosine. Inference used a permutation test that repeated the full analytical pipeline in 5,000 iterations stratified by survey design. Results The cohort included 5,691 reference participants, 2,216 obese participants without heart failure, 287 nonobese participants with heart failure, and 130 participants with both conditions. The mean squared canonical alignment across the survey design splits was 0.205, compared with a permutation null mean of 0.088 and a 99th percentile of 0.120 (empirical p = 0.0002). Alignment was 0.216 after clinical adjustment, 0.219 when restricted to QRS durations below 120 ms, and 0.132 after excluding prior myocardial infarction and major conduction abnormalities. Full sample descriptive principal angles were 32.0 and 81.8 degrees. The leading shared direction was dominated by T-wave amplitudes and frontal T-axis features. Conclusions The electrocardiographic subspaces associated with obesity and self-reported physician-diagnosed heart failure demonstrated statistically nonrandom but incomplete alignment. One shared direction was dominated by repolarization features, while substantial structure remained unique to each survey-defined phenotype. These subspaces represent surface electrophysiological signatures of survey phenotypes, and the calculated principal angles are mathematical representations of historical data (1988-1994), rather than physiologically confirmed disease entities. They should not be interpreted as evidence of true physiological or subclinical heart failure mechanisms. These findings identify a target for longitudinal validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.