ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2026
Timing of radiotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes: a critical narrative review.
Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEmbryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes (ETMR) carries a median overall survival of approximately 10-12 months despite maximal-safe resection, high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and radiotherapy (RT). RT has historically been deferred or omitted in these predominantly infant-age patients owing to concerns over neurodevelopmental toxicity, with HDCT/ASCT serving as the principal consolidation strategy. More recent data have called this approach into question. This narrative review synthesizes the evidence on the timing of RT relative to HDCT/ASCT and its association with outcome in ETMR.
methodsA structured narrative review of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (2000-2025) identified studies reporting ETMR-specific outcomes with extractable data on RT timing relative to ASCT. Major prospective trials (ACNS0334 and P-HIT/HIT2000) and institutional or registry series (n ≥ 4 molecularly or histopathologically confirmed ETMR patients) were considered.
resultsNine studies or study-level cohorts providing ETMR-specific RT-timing data were identified, including the Rare Brain Tumor Registry cohort of 159 molecularly confirmed patients. Across independent cohorts, early RT administered within approximately six weeks of surgery or before protracted HDCT/ASCT is consistently overrepresented among long-term survivors (> 36 months): 10 of 26 (38%) in one literature survey and near-universal RT (17/18; 94%) in another. In the Rare Brain Tumor Registry, two-year event-free survival after gross total resection was 66% with HDCT plus RT versus 21% with HDCT and no RT, and 0% with conventional chemotherapy without RT. Radiation-sparing protocols (ACNS0334) showed predominantly local failure (88%), with salvage RT after progression providing no durable benefit. Tandem HDCT/ASCT without upfront RT (P-HIT/HIT2000) produced a five-year OS of 47% for the carboplatin-etoposide plus tandem-HDCT backbone, superior to other chemotherapy regimens but with frequent on-treatment relapse and no independent prognostic benefit demonstrable for radiotherapy as delivered. Combined RT and HDCT/ASCT was associated with improved survival in some series but, in a small series treated with tandem ASCT, with a high incidence of pseudoprogression and neurocognitive impairment.
conclusionsCurrent evidence indicates that RT deferral beyond the HDCT/ASCT consolidation window is associated with inferior local control and worse long-term outcomes in ETMR. PNOC031, a prospective but nonrandomized trial that assigns RT-eligible patients to early focal RT and RT-ineligible patients to HDCT/ASCT in parallel cohorts, together with future prospective studies, should help to resolve this. Pending those results, and recognizing that the supporting data are observational and subject to selection bias, early focal RT following gross-total resection appears a reasonable and defensible strategy in eligible patients. The relationship between RT timing, HDCT/ASCT, pseudoprogression, and neurodevelopmental toxicity is not yet well understood and warrants further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42853270What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.