ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Imaging in localized intrahepatic bile duct dilatation: a pictorial review of diagnostic and differential approaches.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Localized intrahepatic bile duct dilatation (LIBD) is a prevalent radiological finding characterized by a variety of etiologies, including congenital anomalies, inflammatory conditions, hepatolithiasis, and neoplastic lesions. Accurate differential diagnosis of diseases associated with LIBD is crucial for formulating appropriate treatment strategies and improving patient prognosis. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the definitions, etiologies, clinical symptoms, and key imaging features of common diseases associated with LIBD. Furthermore, it proposes a structured approach for differential diagnosis. By integrating imaging findings with clinical and laboratory data, this approach aims to improve diagnostic accuracy and assist radiologists in making optimal clinical decisions. KEY POINTS: Question LIBD has diverse etiologies and overlapping imaging patterns, but a practical, standardized radiological framework for differential diagnosis remains lacking. Findings This pictorial review summarizes characteristic CT/MRI findings of common LIBD-associated diseases and establishes a stepwise diagnostic approach integrating obstruction points, morphology, and clinical information. Critical Relevance Statement By combining specific imaging patterns with clinical context, this review provides a practical differential diagnostic framework that may improve diagnostic confidence, guide further evaluation, and facilitate earlier detection of malignant transformation in LIBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42853323What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.