ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2026
Infraorbital Skin Application of Menthol Emulsion for Dry Eye Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWe aim to evaluate the short-latency tear-secretory effects and symptom responses of infraorbital menthol emulsion in dry eye disease (DED) without intentional ocular-surface instillation.
methodsIn this randomized, participant- and assessor-masked, vehicle-controlled trial, 128 adults with DED were assigned to bilateral infraorbital application of vehicle (0% menthol), 2% menthol, or 4% menthol emulsion four times daily for 3 weeks. Follow-up measurements were obtained 10 min after supervised application. The available analysis population comprised 95 participants (32, 32, and 31, respectively), and efficacy analyses used the right eye. The primary endpoint was baseline-to-week-3 change in the Schirmer I test without topical anesthesia. Baseline-adjusted mixed models for repeated measures estimated treatment contrasts with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and Dunnett-adjusted P-values.
resultsMean (standard deviation) week-3 Schirmer changes were 1.90 (7.41), 8.56 (7.95), and 8.72 (6.42) mm/5 min in the vehicle, 2%, and 4% groups, respectively. Adjusted differences versus vehicle were 6.69 mm/5 min for 2% menthol (95% CI 2.59-10.80; P< 0.001) and 6.43 mm/5 min for 4% menthol (95% CI 2.23-10.64; P = 0.002). Corresponding tear meniscus height differences were 0.08 mm (95% CI 0.04-0.13; P< 0.001) and 0.09 mm (95% CI 0.05-0.13; P< 0.001). Fluorescein tear break-up time did not meet the adjusted significance threshold. Exploratory dryness visual analog scale (VAS) scores also favored 2% and 4% menthol, with adjusted differences versus vehicle of -22.07 mm (95% CI -32.56 to -11.58) and -26.09 mm (95% CI -36.72 to -15.47), respectively, although subjective outcomes may have been influenced by functional unmasking. No serious adverse events occurred; one participant developed mild periocular erythema that resolved after treatment discontinuation.
conclusionsIn the available analysis population, infraorbital 2% and 4% menthol produced clinically measurable short-latency increases in Schirmer values and tear meniscus height compared with vehicle, supporting further investigation of infraorbital stimulation of endogenous aqueous tear secretion without intentional ocular-surface instillation. The study does not establish persistence of benefit between applications, and confirmation is needed in trials with complete randomized-population follow-up and appropriately designed pre-dose assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42853353What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.