ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026
A modular framework for antibody-drug conjugate biomarkers.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The availability of approved antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has rapidly expanded across oncology indications, yet biomarker development remains dominated by semi-quantitative immunohistochemistry. Robust biomarkers are needed to improve patient selection, guide therapeutic sequencing and identify resistance mechanisms that inform rational combinations. ADC activity depends on target antigen expression, linker chemistry and payload characteristics all within the context of the tumour microenvironment. Consequently, treatment response cannot be predicted solely by target expression. A more comprehensive biomarker framework is required that accounts for antigen abundance and accessibility, intracellular trafficking and linker cleavage, and tumour susceptibility to the payload. Furthermore, biomarkers of toxicity have been largely overlooked, even though toxicity can be equally determinant of clinical utility. In this Review, we outline a modular framework for ADC biomarker development organized around these components. We distinguish established evidence from emerging strategies and discuss technologies that could enable assessment of these determinants. We consider how modular biomarkers might inform patient selection, therapeutic sequencing, rational combinations, dose optimization and regulatory strategy while highlighting the various challenges that must be addressed before broad clinical adoption. Harmonized development across trials, tumour types and geographical regions will be essential to move biomarker development beyond empirical target-expression thresholds.
Identifiers
42855492What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.