Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42855739›Full record

ArticleBiomarker research2026

First-in-human phase Ia study of the covalent TEAD palmitoylation inhibitor BPI-460372 in patients with advanced solid tumors: pharmacokinetics, exposure-limited dosing, and early antitumor activity.

Hongge Liang, Yan Xu, Jing Zhao, Xiaoyan Liu, Wei Zhong, Xin Zheng, Hongzhong Liu, Minjiang Chen, Xiaohong Han, Mengzhao Wang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biomarker research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05789602 (A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Efficacy of BPI-460372 in Advanced Solid Tumor Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05789602 phase1recruitingnot on this map

A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Efficacy of BPI-460372 in Advanced Solid Tumor Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorBetta Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.Ran2023 to 2026Enrolled82ConditionsAdvanced Solid TumorArmsBPI-460372
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hongge LiangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, P.R. China.
Yan XuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, P.R. China.
Jing ZhaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, P.R. China.
Xiaoyan LiuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, P.R. China.
Wei ZhongDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, P.R. China.
Xin ZhengDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, P.R. China.
Hongzhong LiuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, P.R. China.
Minjiang ChenDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, P.R. China. minjiangchen@163.com.
Xiaohong HanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, P.R. China. hanxiaohong@pumch.cn.
Mengzhao WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, P.R. China. mengzhaowang@sina.com.

Funding

National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2025‑PUMCH‑C‑053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Hippo pathway is a critical regulator of tumor development and progression, dysregulation of the Hippo pathway drives tumorigenesis in multiple malignancies. BPI-460,372 is a first‑in‑class covalent irreversible inhibitor of transcriptional enhanced associated domain (TEAD) palmitoylation. This first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary antitumor activity of BPI-460,372 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

methodsThis open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase Ia dose-escalation study enrolled patients with advanced solid tumors who had progressed after standard therapies or lacked available standard treatment options. A modified 3 + 3 design with accelerated titration was used. BPI-460,372 was administered orally once daily under fasting conditions, with dose escalation from 10 mg to 240 mg daily. Additional cohorts evaluated twice-daily dosing (80 mg and 120 mg) and postprandial administration (80 mg and 160 mg) to characterize exposure optimization strategies. Primary endpoints were safety, tolerability, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary antitumor efficacy. Tumor response was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1; modified criteria were applied for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

resultsBetween April 2023 and December 2024, 36 patients were screened, and 28 patients were enrolled and treated. No DLTs were observed, and the MTD was not reached. All patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 89.3% of patients, with grade ≥ 3 events occurring in 39.3%. Proteinuria was the most common TRAE (46.4%, including 10.7% grade ≥ 3). Three deaths occurred during the study, including one treatment-related death due to abdominal infection. Pharmacokinetic analyses demonstrated rapid absorption, dose-dependent increases in exposure, achievement of steady-state exposure after repeated dosing, and limited drug accumulation. Among 28 evaluable patients, one confirmed partial response (PR) was observed in the 120 mg twice-daily cohort. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 3.6% (95% CI: 0.1-18.4) and 64.3% (95% CI: 44.1-81.4), respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 months (95% CI: 2.4-7.0), and median overall survival (OS) was 13.2 months (95% CI: 7.4-15.1).

conclusionBPI-460,372 demonstrated a distinct pharmacokinetic profile and showed preliminary antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. However, treatment-emergent toxicities and exposure limitations constrained further dose escalation and prevented definition of an optimal biologically active dose. These findings support further clinical evaluation of BPI-460,372 using optimized dosing strategies, particularly in tumors with Hippo pathway dependency.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05789602. Registered on 29 March 2023.

Indexed as

Advanced solid tumorsBPI-460372Hippo pathwayPhase Ia trialTEAD inhibitor

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.