ArticleOsteoporosis and sarcopenia2026
Osteoporosis screening and management framework for community-based primary care in Hong Kong: A Delphi consensus study.
Article in Osteoporosis and sarcopenia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Osteoporosis poses a significant public health challenge as it leads to an increased incidence of fractures. This can result in considerable disability and substantial financial burdens. With the rapidly aging population in Hong Kong, the incidence and impact of osteoporotic fractures are expected to rise, underscoring the need for a coordinated, community-based care model to identify at-risk older adults and offer timely management. Methods: This study adopted a Delphi methodology to develop consensus statements and a structured framework for community osteoporosis screening and management in Hong Kong. A multidisciplinary panel of 15 experts with experience in osteoporosis care in the primary care setting participated in three iterative rounds of surveys that collected anonymized ratings and feedback. Results: A total of 31 consensus statements were established covering risk assessment, diagnosis, referral, and the care pathway of osteoporosis in the primary care setting. The statements provide practical recommendations for a systematic framework that streamlines workflow and delineates roles and responsibilities for primary care professionals and carers. This guidance is intended for primary care services, including community pharmacies, district health centers, and elderly service centers engaged in osteoporosis screening and management of individuals diagnosed with the condition. Conclusions: The consensus recommendations advocate for the development of a sustainable, community-driven service framework that promotes routine risk assessment, timely initiation of treatment and coordinated long-term management. Implementation of this model has the potential to improve patient outcomes, reduce fracture-related morbidity, and alleviate the overall healthcare burden of osteoporosis in Hong Kong.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.