ReviewJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026
Prevalence, mechanisms, and psychological outcomes of chronic pain in cancer survivors: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.
Review in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeChronic pain develops as a frequent health issue for cancer survivors. It affects both their physical and mental well-being. Although pain management is important, long-term care strategies are often lacking. The aim of this systematic review and narrative synthesis was to examine the prevalence of chronic pain among cancer survivors, explore the mechanisms of chronic pain, and examine its impact on their mental health.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review of studies identified through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and PsycINFO. The review included studies published between 2011 and 2026. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools, and the certainty of evidence across the three outcome domains was evaluated using the GRADE approach. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025638968).
resultsThe research included 32 studies, including cross-sectional and cohort studies that investigated various types of cancer. Chronic pain prevalence varied substantially across studies, ranging from 8.6% to 67.1% among established long-term survivor cohorts. Across the included studies, neuropathic pain features were frequently reported, while some survivor populations showed symptom profiles consistent with nociplastic pain or central sensitization. However, most mechanistic classifications were based on screening instruments rather than diagnostic confirmation. Cancer survivors with chronic pain reported higher levels of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and emotional distress, together with poorer quality of life.
conclusionChronic pain represents a substantial and heterogeneous burden among adult cancer survivors and is associated with adverse psychological and functional outcomes. Neuropathic pain features are commonly reported, while evidence for nociplastic mechanisms and central sensitization remains suggestive and is largely based on symptom-based assessment tools. These findings support the need for multidimensional pain assessment in survivorship care while highlighting the need for stronger mechanistic research. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Chronic pain frequently persists after cancer treatment and is linked to psychological distress and poorer quality of life. Survivors should report ongoing pain and emotional symptoms, and survivorship care should include routine assessment of both.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42859320What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.