ArticleWellcome open research2026
Enhancing Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy at Discharge Through Collaborative Care: Evidence from the TIME-HF Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Wellcome open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Nurse-led care supported by mobile health (mHealth) technologies offers a feasible strategy to strengthen heart failure (HF) management in resource-constrained settings. This study evaluated the impact of an mHealth-enabled, nurse-led collaborative care model on prescription of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) at discharge among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in India. Methods: The TIME-HF study was a multicenter, open-label, cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted across 22 centers enrolling patients with HFrEF. Centers were randomized 1:1 to an intervention arm (11 centers; 755 patients) or enhanced usual care (11 centers; 752 patients). In the intervention arm, nurses used an mHealth application to review GDMT prescriptions and recommend treatment modifications to physicians. GDMT at discharge was assessed individually and using a composite score. Intervention effects were evaluated using multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models. Results: Participants were predominantly male (77.6%) with a mean age of 61.9 years (SD 12.1). Hypertension (56.1%), diabetes (62%), and chronic kidney disease (18.4%) were common comorbidities. Ischemic heart disease was the leading etiology (77.4%), and 48.8% were in NYHA class III/IV. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. At discharge, 20% received all four GDMT components, with higher use in the intervention group than usual care (27% vs 13%, p < 0.001; adjusted OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.48-1.75). Intervention participants were also more likely to achieve a high GDMT score (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-1.22). Conclusion: An mHealth-supported nurse-led discharge medication review improved GDMT use in HFrEF and may help reduce preventable HF mortality in India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.