Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42860978›Full record

ReviewGynecology and pelvic medicine2026

Bacterial vaginosis: a narrative review of concepts and best practices.

José Eleutério Junior, Renata Mírian Nunes Eleutério, Ana Katherine Gonçalves, Paulo César Giraldo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gynecology and pelvic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

José Eleutério JuniorDepartment of Women's, Children's and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Renata Mírian Nunes EleutérioProf. Eleutério Laboratory, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Ana Katherine GonçalvesObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Paulo César GiraldoObstetrics and Gynecology Department, State University of Campinas, Faculty of Medicine, Campinas, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a multifaceted condition characterized by an imbalance of the vaginal microbiota. This disruption includes not only Methods: We conducted a search on MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Google Scholar, and Scopus for publications in English, prior to September 2025, using the keywords [vaginal microbiota] OR [vaginal microbiome] OR [vaginosis] OR [bacterial vaginosis] OR [dysbiosis] AND [vagina] AND [diagnosis] AND [treatment]. We also reviewed the references of the articles obtained through our literature searches. Key Content and Findings: BV is characterized by a shift from aerobic to anaerobic microbiota. Anaerobic bacteria and their metabolites can significantly impact the local immune response, resulting in various complications in women's reproductive health. Although most affected individuals remain asymptomatic, dysbiosis may negatively influence pregnancy outcomes and elevate the risk of sexually transmitted infections. Diagnosis is traditionally based on the Amsel criteria and Nugent Score. More recently, nucleic acid amplification tests, particularly those utilizing multiplex platforms, have been implemented to identify bacterial species such as Conclusions: BV has long been recognized, and diagnosis has traditionally been based on Amsel's criteria and Nugent's score. While new diagnostic tools have offered valuable insights, they have also introduced new questions about this complex condition. Metronidazole remains the primary treatment, although adjuvant therapies, such as biofilm disruption and probiotics, are often required. Further large-scale, in-depth studies are needed to address ongoing uncertainties.

Indexed as

Bacterial vaginosis (BV)dysbiosismicrobiomemicrobiotanarrative review

Identifiers

PMID42860978
PMCPMC13653791

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.