ReviewThe European journal of general practice2026
What has been used to improve patients' spiritual health in primary care: A realist review.
Review in The European journal of general practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpiritual health is a vital aspect of holistic health linked to improved outcomes, yet little is known about approaches used in primary care to support this dimension of wellbeing.
objectivesTo identify which interventions have been used to improve patients' spiritual health in primary care, and what works, for whom, and in which contexts.
methodsA qualitative realist review was registered with PROSPERO and conducted in line with RAMESES standards. Systematic database searches were completed in May 2024 and June 2025. Iterative analysis and synthesis were informed by discussions with professionals to situate findings within real-world practice contexts.
resultsFive European interventions were identified, each offering person-centred, listening-based support to address spiritual or existential concerns. These services operated in small, motivated pockets of practice rather than as routine provision. Validated outcome measures showed improvements in emotional wellbeing, but none directly assessed spiritual health. Most interventions followed a chaplaincy model adapted from hospital care and faced barriers to wider implementation: limited funding, workforce pressures, and inconsistent referral pathways.
conclusionSpiritual health interventions can provide valuable holistic support within primary care, but current provision is fragmented, locally driven, and often unsustainable. Improving timely referrals, increasing practitioner confidence, and reducing stigma surrounding spiritual health are priorities. A social asset-based approach may complement existing practice by equipping primary care staff to recognise spiritual need and connect patients with community organisations. Further research is required to determine the acceptability, effectiveness, and scalability of chaplaincy and alternative asset-based models of spiritual care within primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.