ArticlePloS one2026
Adaptation of the Quiet Quitting Scale into Turkish: A methodological study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quiet quitting has emerged as a contemporary work behavior associated with reduced organizational engagement and increased work-related stress, particularly among healthcare professionals. This study aimed to adapt the Quiet Quitting Scale into Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability among healthcare workers. This methodological study was conducted online between February and April 2025. The sample included 298 healthcare professionals currently working in Turkey. Data were collected using the "Personal Information Form" and the "Quiet Quitting Scale." Content validity analysis showed item-level I-CVI values ranging from 0.83 to 1.00, with a total scale S-CVI of 0.97. Factor loadings for individual items ranged from 0.510 to 0.890. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed that the proposed factor structure fitted the data well, with model fit indices as follows: χ² = 64.31; df = 21; p < 0.05; χ²/df = 3.06; RMSEA = 0.083; CFI = 0.97; SRMR = 0.052; TLI = 0.95; RMR = 0.069; AIC = 112.31. These findings provide strong support for the structural validity of the scale. The Turkish version of the Quiet Quitting Scale demonstrates both validity and reliability, making it a suitable tool for evaluating quiet quitting tendencies among healthcare workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.