Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42864426›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Current status of lymphedema-related health information-seeking behavior and its associated factors among postoperative breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study.

Huan Zheng, Fang Chen, Lu Wang, Kai Cao, Xiaoyan Zhao, Lewen Shao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Huan ZhengDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Fang ChenDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Lu WangDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Kai CaoDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaoyan ZhaoDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Lewen ShaoDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. 951109@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth information-seeking behavior (HISB) among postoperative breast cancer (BC) patients significantly contributes to lymphedema prevention and management, enhancing patients' self-care abilities and health outcomes. Identifying factors associated with HISB can provide scientific evidence and practical insights for developing effective information-seeking-focused health education programs for this population.

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the current status of lymphedema-related HISB and identify factors associated with HISB among postoperative breast cancer patients.

methodsA cross-sectional study involving 196 patients was conducted from December 2024 to January 2025 at the Department of Breast Surgery in a tertiary hospital in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province. Data collection utilized the General Information Questionnaire, the Upper Extremity Lymphedema Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) scale, and the HISB Scale. Multiple linear regression was employed to identify factors associated with HISB among participants.

resultsThe mean HISB score related to lymphedema among the 196 postoperative BC patients was 178.21 he25.02. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the total KAP score was significantly associated with HISB (B 5.0.850, 95% CI: 0.673 to 1.027, β = 0.621, p .60.001). In addition, patients who reported "unknown" axillary lymph node dissection status had significantly lower HISB scores compared with those who reported 0 nodes removed (B .001)15.467, 95% CI: - 28.321 to - 2.614, p .60.019). The final model explained 40.2% of the variance in HISB (adjusted R

conclusionHealthcare providers may consider assessing whether patients can report their axillary lymph node dissection status and providing clarification for those who report "unknown" status; however, this finding is based on a comparison with the 0-node reference group and should be interpreted cautiously. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: This study describes HISB scores and associated factors among postoperative BC patients lymphedema-related HISB, including lymphedema knowledge and reporting "unknown" axillary lymph node dissection status compared with reporting 0 nodes removed. These findings can inform healthcare providers in refining patient-centered health education and communication strategies, thereby enhancing patient engagement and self-management capabilities.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500112931. Retrospectively registered on 21 November 2025. This manuscript reports the quantitative component of a registered mixed-methods study.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInformation Seeking BehaviorLymphedemaPostoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesBreast cancerHealth information-seeking behaviorLymphedemaNursing care

Identifiers

PMID42864426
PMCPMC13658365

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.