Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42864569›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2026

Physiologically based Biopharmaceutics Modeling (PBBM) Reveals a Low Dissolution-related Bioequivalence Risk for Immediate-Release Amlodipine Tablets.

Porfirio de la Cruz Cruz, Larissa Lopes Rodrigues Gomide, Gabriela Moraes do Nascimento, José Trinidad Pérez Urizar, Alberto Martínez Muñoz, Ángel Antonio Vértiz Hernández, Amaury de Jesús Pozos Guillén, Héctor Eduardo Flores Reyes, Ricardo Zamora Ramírez, Luis Manuel Romero Cruz and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Porfirio de la Cruz CruzDoctorado Institucional en Ingeniería y Ciencia de Materiales (DICIM) de la Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí (UASLP), San Luis Potosí, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1105-5819
Larissa Lopes Rodrigues GomideDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Environmental, Chemical, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Diadema, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1843-0602
Gabriela Moraes do NascimentoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Environmental, Chemical, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Diadema, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4476-0047
José Trinidad Pérez UrizarFacultad de Ciencias Químicas de la Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Av. Dr. Manuel Nava 6 Zona, 78210, San Luis Potosí, México. jpurizar@uaslp.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0642-0033
Alberto Martínez MuñozFS SCIENTIA PHARMA S.A. de C.V (Authorized Third Party), San Luis Potosí, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7503-2328
Ángel Antonio Vértiz HernándezCoordinación Académica Región Altiplano, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7555-8303
Amaury de Jesús Pozos GuillénFacultad de Estomatología, Laboratorio de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2314-8465
Héctor Eduardo Flores ReyesFacultad de Estomatología, Laboratorio de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7715-7888
Ricardo Zamora RamírezUltra Laboratorios S.A. de C.V., Investigación y Desarrollo. Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7189-2876
Luis Manuel Romero CruzUltra Laboratorios S.A. de C.V., Investigación y Desarrollo. Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4096-4919
Marcelino García SánchezUltra Laboratorios S.A. de C.V., Investigación y Desarrollo. Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0056-1916
Mauricio A GarcíaDepartamento de Farmacia, Escuela de Química y Farmacia, Facultad de Química y de Farmacia, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 7820436, Santiago de Chile, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5618-3318
Michele Georges IssaDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6099-3687
Marcelo Dutra DuqueDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Environmental, Chemical, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Diadema, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-9862

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A conservative BCS class III classification was recently proposed for amlodipine based on inconclusive permeability evidence. However, the scarce in vivo data suggest that amlodipine is slowly, though completely, absorbed. This means that the very rapid dissolution criterion associated with a BCS class III classification may be overly restrictive for immediate-release amlodipine products. The aim of this manuscript was to develop and validate a physiologically based biopharmaceutics model (PBBM) to assess the risk of bioequivalence failure associated with dissolution. Given that amlodipine is a lipophilic weak base, the absorption model incorporated a surrogate representation of intracellular lysosomal trapping through the Fu

Indexed as

AmlodipineBiopharmaceuticsModels, BiologicalAdministration, OralComputer SimulationDrug LiberationHumansSolubilityTabletsTherapeutic EquivalencyAmlodipineTabletsamlodipinebioequivalencein vitro dissolutionlysosomal trappingphysiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM)

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.