ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2026
Staff Perspectives of Implementing a Community-Based Stroke Recovery Program in Regional Australia: A Qualitative Study.
Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the experience of non-government organisation (NGO) staff implementing a community-based stroke recovery program based on the principles of environmental enrichment.
designA qualitative descriptive study to capture staff experiences. Semi-structured interviews with staff were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
settingA community-based NGO service in regional New South Wales, Australia.
participantsEight staff members employed in a regional NGO and involved in the implementation of the program, including a program coordinator, a physiotherapist, allied health assistants, creative artists and managers.
resultsFour themes were identified: (1) We've got a great space here-highlighted the importance of the physical environment, access and location; (2) There's an order to it-described the program's strong foundations formed through training, defined processes and support; (3) We make it work-demonstrated the flexibility and adaptability of staff in responding to individual needs and overcoming challenges and (4) Enriching lives-captured the sense of community, positivity and recovery outcomes. Staff experiences aligned closely with self-determination theory, reflecting feelings of capability, confidence and connection.
conclusionStaff in a regional NGO felt well-supported and capable of delivering a community-based stroke program. This demonstrates the potential role NGO services may play in addressing gaps in stroke recovery care in regional Australia. The methods used in this study can be used to implement this and other similar community-based programs with NGO services in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.