Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42865525›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

Trust your gut: the neuro-gastroenteric mechanics of prediction and expectation.

Alessia Caccamo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alessia CaccamoDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Living organisms constantly make probabilistic predictions about what they expect to see in their external environment, and actively solicit information from the environment to inform their predictions. This process is foundational for many frameworks including Active Inference and Predictive Processing. It relies on organisms having prior expectations, entailed by an internal generative model of the environment. Posterior expectations are updated based on the selected data, driven by prediction error minimization. However, failures to contextualize the precision or confidence placed in predictions, can give rise to perceptual abnormalities that are at the basis of various psychiatric conditions. Different factors can influence this process. Notably, disruptions in the gut microbiome have been implicated in some psychotic disorders. Gut microbial dysregulation has also been associated with alterations in neurotransmitter synthesis, metabolism, and turnover, which may affect processes involved in the encoding of precision of prediction errors. On the basis of this gut-brain connection, this Hypothesis and Theory article hypothesizes that the gut microbiome plays a role as a modulator of predictive processing, influencing how predictions are formed and expectations updated. Specifically, this article explores the importance of "mental model" embodiment, and considers the role of hippocampal activity in predictive coding and its modulation by the gut microbiome. Finally, it offers a novel perspective on the use of cortico-hippocampal-gastroenteric frameworks for inferring personalized dietary interventions in nutritional psychiatry.

Indexed as

gut-brain axisgut microbiomehippocampusnutritional psychiatrypredictive codingprior expectations

Identifiers

PMID42865525
PMCPMC13654766

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.