Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42865537›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Adolescent non-suicidal self-injury scale - short form: revision and evaluation of its reliability and validity.

Ao Li, Xiaoxiao Song, Xiaoyan Wang, Quanwei Zheng, Xu Zhang, Mengxin Sun, Shaobo Lyu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ao LiHebei Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Brain Science, School of Psychology and Mental Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei, China.
Xiaoxiao SongHebei Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Brain Science, School of Psychology and Mental Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei, China.
Xiaoyan WangLibrary, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei, China.
Quanwei ZhengGuokai Experimental School, Tangshan, Hebei, China.
Xu ZhangGuokai Experimental School, Tangshan, Hebei, China.
Mengxin SunGuokai Experimental School, Tangshan, Hebei, China.
Shaobo LyuHebei Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Brain Science, School of Psychology and Mental Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a clinically significant concern among adolescents, and its accurate yet efficient assessment is essential for research, early identification, and intervention. Existing Chinese instruments-most notably the 19-item Adolescent Self-Harm Questionnaire (ASHS)-are relatively lengthy and ill-suited to rapid, large-scale screening. The present study had two aims: (a) to develop a short form of the ASHS, the Adolescent Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Scale-Short Form (ANSSI-SF), by integrating classical test theory (CTT) item analysis with genetic algorithm (GA) cross-validation, and (b) to evaluate its reliability, validity, and screening utility relative to the parent scale. Methods: Using a convenience sample of 1,090 primary and secondary school students, seven items-one for each of seven behavioral categories derived from a functional-typological framework of self-harm-were selected on the basis of CTT item statistics and GA cross-validation. The scale was evaluated through item analysis, internal-consistency and split-half reliability, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA/CFA), correlations with theoretically related constructs, known-groups comparisons (gender; smartphone addiction), and consistency and screening-accuracy analyses against the full 19-item ASHS. Results: It indicated that all items demonstrated strong correlations with the total score, and both internal consistency and split-half reliability reached satisfactory levels.A unidimensional factor structure also exhibited good model fit. Additionally, scale scores were significantly positively correlated with related psychological indicators such as depression, anxiety, and sleep problems, and effectively differentiated differences in self-injurious behavior across gender and smartphone addiction groups.GA cross-validation confirmed that the selected items balanced parsimony with full coverage of all seven behavioral categories. Discussion: These findings indicate that the ANSSI-SF is a brief, reliable, and valid instrument that preserves the content breadth of the parent ASHS while substantially reducing administration burden. It is well suited to rapid, large-scale screening and early identification of at-risk adolescents, facilitating timely referral and prevention. Limitations include convenience sampling from a single region and the absence of test-retest reliability; future research should validate the scale in clinical and diverse cultural samples and examine its predictive validity.

Indexed as

adolescentsgenetic algorithmnon-suicidal self-injurious behaviorrapid screeningscale revision

Identifiers

PMID42865537
PMCPMC13654949

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.