ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Development and validation of a machine learning model for preoperative prediction of intraoperative hypothermia in gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a two-center cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intraoperative hypothermia (IOH, temperature <36.0 °C) is a common complication in gynecological laparoscopic surgery that leads to significant adverse outcomes that would benefit from preoperative risk prediction. Methods: We developed and compared two predictive models-a conventional multivariable logistic regression (LR) model and a gradient boosting machine (XGBoost) model-to preoperatively predict IOH based on 20 objectively measurable preoperative clinical variables that could be directly extracted from electronic health records (EHRs). The derivation cohort consisted of 460 cases from a tertiary care center in 2024, which were randomly divided into a training set ( Results: We initially analyzed 20 preoperative variables. The final model incorporated eight key indicators: body mass index (BMI), ASA physical status, fasting period, basal body temperature, estimated surgical duration, hypertension status, serum albumin level, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). The derivation cohort consisted of 460 patients, split into a training set ( Conclusions: We developed and validated an interpretable XGBoost model using eight readily available preoperative clinical indicators. The model demonstrated good performance for the preoperative prediction of IOH in gynecological laparoscopic surgery, which may facilitate early identification of high-risk patients and timely intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.