ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Psychological Experiences and Food Avoidance Behavior in Patients Following Esophageal Cancer Surgery: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nutritional rehabilitation is essential for recovery after esophagectomy. However, food avoidance behavior is common and may compromise nutritional intake, quality of life, and postoperative recovery. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing food avoidance behavior and the psychological and contextual processes underlying such behavior after esophagectomy, with the aim of informing targeted psychosocial and behavioral interventions and individualized dietary management. Methods: A descriptive qualitative design was used. Guided by the Roy Adaptation Model (RAM), a semi-structured interview guide was developed. Sixteen patients who had undergone esophagectomy were purposively recruited from a tertiary cancer hospital in central China. Directed content analysis was conducted, with NVivo 14.0 used to facilitate data organization and coding. The RAM guided the coding framework and category development. Results: Four main categories and ten subcategories were identified: physiological function factors (taste changes and swallowing discomfort; recurrent symptoms), self-concept factors (lack of nutritional knowledge; fear of disease recurrence; traumatic experiences of illness), role function factors (the patient role limiting social functioning; social role priorities overriding dietary management), and interdependence factors (passive dietary restriction in dependent relationships; lack of post-discharge follow-up; economic burden). Conclusions: Food avoidance behavior after esophagectomy reflects the interaction of physiological symptoms, illness-related beliefs and experiences, role-related challenges, caregiver influences, and limitations in post-discharge support. RAM-informed care should integrate individualized nutritional support, psychological counseling, behavioral guidance, caregiver education, and continuous follow-up to reduce unnecessary food avoidance and promote nutritional and psychological adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.