ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Clinical outcomes following a traditional Chinese medicine foot bath preparation for lower-limb edema and sleep disturbance: a single-center retrospective study of 2,000 patients.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate clinical outcomes and documented adverse events following treatment with a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) foot bath preparation in patients with lower-limb edema and sleep disturbance. Methods: This single-center retrospective observational study included 2,000 patients treated at Lanzhou Second People's Hospital between May 2017 and May 2022. All patients had varying degrees of lower-limb edema, peripheral circulatory dysfunction, and sleep disturbance. Patients received a standardized TCM foot bath preparation consisting of stir-fried peach kernel (10 g), bush cherry seed (15 g), Chinese angelica root (10 g), and safflower (10 g). The preparation was administered once daily for 20 sessions, comprising two consecutive 10-day treatment courses. Clinical outcomes were assessed by comparing ankle circumference, ABI, and PSQI values before and after treatment. Results: Using the routine record-based classification, 1,120 patients (56.0%) were classified as "markedly effective," 770 (38.5%) as "effective," and 110 (5.5%) as "ineffective." The combined proportion was 94.5%; however, this classification is not internationally validated and is reported descriptively rather than as evidence of effectiveness. After treatment, ankle circumference and PSQI scores were significantly lower than baseline values (both P < 0.01), whereas ABI values were significantly higher (P < 0.05). Mild local adverse reactions, including transient redness and dryness, were observed in a small proportion of patients. Conclusion: In this single-center retrospective observational study, post-treatment changes were observed in lower-limb edema, peripheral circulation, and sleep quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.