ReviewOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2026
Whole peritoneal radiotherapy in malignant ascites: a hypothesis-generating conceptual review.
Review in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Malignant ascites (MA) impairs quality of life and remains difficult to control with symptomatic treatments. We summarize the rationale, uncertainties, and potential role of whole-peritoneal radiotherapy (WPRT) as an investigational palliative strategy for MA. The available evidence is limited, and no prospective or high-quality data currently establish WPRT as an effective treatment for MA. Content: We conducted a narrative review of MA in the context of palliative radiotherapy, whole-abdominal and whole-peritoneal irradiation, technical feasibility, and treatment-related toxicity. Because no prospective or systematically designed studies have evaluated WPRT using ascites-specific endpoints, indirect evidence was included. An illustrative radiotherapy planning simulation in a model patient was also presented to demonstrate technical considerations. Summary: Direct evidence supporting WPRT for symptom control in MA is lacking. However, the available literature provides a plausible rationale for this approach. Published literature supports the technical feasibility of large-field abdominal irradiation in selected oncological settings, but does not establish the feasibility, safety, or efficacy of WPRT specifically for MA. Outlook: WPRT should be regarded as an investigational palliative approach supported by clinical rationale rather than evidence-based practice. WPRT may extend symptom-directed palliative radiotherapy to selected patients with MA, but its value requires prospective evaluation using ascites-specific endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.