ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Comparative evaluation of guava leaf extract and chlorhexidine mouthwash in plaque-induced gingivitis: A clinical and computational approach.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gingivitis can be found in up to 90% of the population with dental plaque being the primary cause and chemical approaches such as antimicrobial mouth washes, for eliminating plaque, are suggested for either supplementing the mechanical removal of plaque or, in some instances, substituting for it. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a mouthwash containing guava leaf extract and compare it with standard chlorhexidine mouthwash as adjuncts to professional scaling for plaque-induced gingivitis among young adults. Methods: This study was performed as a triple-blinded, randomized controlled trial and study participants were allocated into two groups, with one receiving 0.15% hydro-ethanolic guava mouthwash, and the other receiving 0.12% chlorhexidine, of 10 ml each for 30 s, twice daily, for two weeks as adjuncts to professional scaling along with appropriate tooth brushing. Results: The analysis showed that both 0.15% guava and 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwashes demonstrated significant reductions in median plaque and gingival scores from baseline to 28 Conclusion: The present study concluded that 0.15% hydro-ethanolic guava mouthwash could be an adjunct to professional scaling for plaque-induced gingivitis on par with chlorhexidine mouthwash when appropriate tooth brushing techniques are followed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.