ArticleAnnals of intensive care2026
The effects of hemoadsorption in patients with sepsis-associated persistent severe AKI who require CRRT: A prospective, randomized controlled pilot study.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis-associated persistent severe acute kidney injury (S-PAKI) is marked by a sustained hyperinflammatory response and is associated with a poor prognosis. Hemoadsorption functions by removing circulating cytokines and other inflammatory mediators. This study aims to evaluate the impact of CVVH combined with hemoadsorption on the prognosis of patients with S-PAKI who need CRRT. Methods: This prospective, randomized, single-center pilot study involved 76 S-PAKI patients who required CRRT. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either CVVH combined with hemoadsorption (CVVH + HA group, n = 38) or conventional CVVH therapy (CVVH group, n = 38). The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included changes in Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, renal functional prognosis, alterations in biomarker and cytokine levels, changes in hemodynamic parameters, as well as the duration of renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and overall hospital stay among survivors. Results: The CVVH + HA group showed a statistically non-significant trend to lower 30-day all-cause mortality compared to the CVVH group (36.8% vs. 52.6%, P = 0.159). A post hoc exploratory subgroup analysis revealed that among patients with Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 14 (CCL14) levels greater than 1.3 ng/ml, the mortality risk in the CVVH + HA group was lower than that in the CVVH group. In terms of secondary outcomes, hemoadsorption therapy significantly decreased APACHE II and SOFA scores, enhanced cytokine clearance, and improved hemodynamic status; however, it did not lead to significant improvements in renal functional prognosis, nor did it shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, ICU stay, or overall hospital stay among survivors. Conclusions: In this pilot trial, hemoadsorption therapy did not significantly reduce 30-day mortality across the entire cohort. However, a post hoc exploratory subgroup analysis suggested a potential association with improved survival in patients with elevated urinary CCL14 levels. These exploratory, hypothesis-generating findings require confirmation in adequately powered, biomarker-guided randomized trials. Trial registration: ChiCTR2400093572, registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) on December 09, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.