ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2026
Fracture risk and fracture risk factor assessment among men at prostate cancer diagnosis.
Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOlder men with prostate cancer, particularly those receiving androgen deprivation therapy, have an increased fracture risk. However, contemporary studies assessing baseline fracture risk in ethnically diverse populations of men at initial prostate cancer diagnosis remain limited.
methodsMen aged 50-89 years with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (2010-2022) in a US integrated healthcare system were identified. Demographic data, smoking, prior fracture, rheumatoid arthritis, recent glucocorticoid therapy, body mass index (FRAX variables), and other risk factors (diabetes, low 25OH-vitamin D level) were ascertained from electronic health records. Ten-year risks of hip (10yHIP) and major osteoporotic fractures (10yMOF) were calculated using the US FRAX (race/ethnicity-specific, without bone density); additional scores removed race/ethnicity calibration. High fracture risk was defined as 10yMOF ≥ 20% and 10yHIP ≥ 3%.
resultsAmong 25,413 men with prostate cancer (mean age 66.1 ± 8.1 years; 64.8% White, 12.3% Black, 10.7% Hispanic, 11.5% Asian/Pacific Islander (PI)), 87.5%, 3.4%, and 9.1% had local or locally advanced disease, node-positive, and metastatic disease, respectively. Overall, 7.2% smoked, 20.4% had diabetes, and 6.4% had a prior fracture with demographic variation; <1% had rheumatoid arthritis or extended glucocorticoid therapy. Few (0.2%) had 10yMOF ≥ 20% but 11.6% had 10yHIP ≥ 3%, ranging from 15.5% (White), 7.3% (Asian/PI), 4.8% (Hispanic) and 1.4% (Black) and increasing to 14.9% (Asian/PI), 10.9% (Hispanic), and 8.1% (Black) without race/ethnicity calibration. Age was a major risk factor; 20.5% of men aged ≥65 years, increasing to 87.3% of men aged 80-89 years had 10yHIP ≥ 3%. Diabetes and hypovitaminosis D were especially prevalent among non-White populations.
conclusion1 in 9 men with prostate cancer had a high calculated hip fracture risk at diagnosis, increasing to 1 in 5 men aged ≥65 years, with key demographic differences. These observations in real-world populations underscore the importance of skeletal health assessment among older men with prostate cancer and evaluation of fracture risk assessment tools to inform clinical management.
Identifiers
42869964What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.