Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42870055›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026

The effects of different exercise approaches on muscle mechanical properties, strength, and jump performance: a randomised controlled trial.

Selim Mahmut Günay, Nevin Aysel Güzel, Naile Bolca Topal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Selim Mahmut GünayFaculty of Health Science, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey. selimmahmut.gunay@mku.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7550-5244
Nevin Aysel GüzelDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Naile Bolca TopalDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhole-body vibration (WBV), strengthening, and aerobic exercises are widely used to improve muscle function and physical performance; however, their comparative effects on passive muscle mechanical properties remain uncertain. This randomised trial compared their effects on muscle stiffness, thickness, isokinetic strength, and horizontal jump performance in sedentary healthy women.

methodsForty-four women aged 18-40 years were randomised (1:1:1:1) to WBV, strengthening, aerobic exercise, or control; 40 were analysed (n = 10 per group). Exercise groups completed supervised sessions three times weekly for four weeks. Stiffness and thickness were assessed using shear wave elastography and B-mode ultrasonography, strength using isokinetic dynamometry, and horizontal jump distance. Imaging and strength assessors were blinded. Mixed-design ANOVA was the main analysis; supplementary post hoc analyses incorporated the corresponding baseline outcome and body mass, with alternative models used when ANCOVA assumptions were not satisfied.

resultsGroup × time interactions were not significant for stiffness or thickness (p = 0.092-0.595). Significant interactions were observed for all strength outcomes and horizontal jump performance (p = 0.002-0.016; partial η

conclusionFour weeks of exercise produced outcome-specific responses without demonstrating modality-specific changes in passive muscle stiffness or thickness or superiority among active interventions.

Indexed as

ElastographyExerciseMuscle thicknessStiffnessVibration training

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.