ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Comparing physical education course satisfaction between students with hearing and visual impairments in Mainland China: a revised importance-Performance analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study examined physical education satisfaction among Chinese university students with hearing and visual impairments using Revised Importance-Performance Analysis (RIPA). Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 449 students from 10 universities in Guangdong Province, China, including 251 students with hearing impairments and 198 students with visual impairments. The study assessed perceptions of instructional content, teaching practices, learning outcomes, and overall physical education experiences. Results: The findings revealed distinct patterns of needs and satisfaction between the two groups. Students with hearing impairments placed greater importance on instructional clarity, communication accessibility, and individualized support, whereas students with visual impairments prioritized course accessibility, activity safety, and support for sustained physical activity engagement. Across both groups, immediate participation experiences and inclusive learning environments were valued more highly than long-term physical fitness outcomes. Discussion: These findings indicate that physical education satisfaction among students with sensory impairments is shaped by disability-specific needs and educational experiences. Accordingly, universities should adopt disability-specific physical education strategies by strengthening communication accessibility and individualized instructional support for students with hearing impairments, while emphasizing activity accessibility, safety, and sustained physical activity engagement for students with visual impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.