ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Timing is everything: the effect of measurement timing on trailing limb angle in gait analysis.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Progress towards a meaningful clinical measure of propulsion has been achieved through the trailing limb angle, which describes the position of the trailing limb at the time of peak propulsion. However, variations in the timing of the calculation could limit its clinical translation. The purpose of this study was to compare commonly used approaches to trailing limb angle measurement. Methods: Nineteen middle-aged adults (mean age [SD]: 56.42 [4.14]) without impairment completed three-dimensional gait analysis while walking on an instrumented split-belt treadmill. Propulsion was defined as the anterior component of the ground reaction force. Peak trailing limb angle was calculated and compared to the angle measured at the time of peak propulsion. Heel strike and toe-off timing were calculated to describe the time of peak propulsion relative to key gait events. Kinematics of the trailing and leading limb hip, knee, and ankle joints were also calculated. Results: Peak propulsion occurred at 47.50% of the gait cycle, just before contralateral heel strike (49.99%). Peak trailing limb angle (22.77°) was statistically significantly larger than its value when measured at peak propulsion (16.08°, Discussion: Our findings challenge the assumption that peak trailing limb angle is equivalent to the trailing limb angle measured at peak propulsion. Calculation methods should reflect this critical distinction to ensure methodological consistency in both research and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.