Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42870994›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026

Timing is everything: the effect of measurement timing on trailing limb angle in gait analysis.

Sally Kenworthy, Stacey Gorniak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sally KenworthyDepartment of Health and Human Performance, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Stacey GorniakDepartment of Health and Human Performance, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Progress towards a meaningful clinical measure of propulsion has been achieved through the trailing limb angle, which describes the position of the trailing limb at the time of peak propulsion. However, variations in the timing of the calculation could limit its clinical translation. The purpose of this study was to compare commonly used approaches to trailing limb angle measurement. Methods: Nineteen middle-aged adults (mean age [SD]: 56.42 [4.14]) without impairment completed three-dimensional gait analysis while walking on an instrumented split-belt treadmill. Propulsion was defined as the anterior component of the ground reaction force. Peak trailing limb angle was calculated and compared to the angle measured at the time of peak propulsion. Heel strike and toe-off timing were calculated to describe the time of peak propulsion relative to key gait events. Kinematics of the trailing and leading limb hip, knee, and ankle joints were also calculated. Results: Peak propulsion occurred at 47.50% of the gait cycle, just before contralateral heel strike (49.99%). Peak trailing limb angle (22.77°) was statistically significantly larger than its value when measured at peak propulsion (16.08°, Discussion: Our findings challenge the assumption that peak trailing limb angle is equivalent to the trailing limb angle measured at peak propulsion. Calculation methods should reflect this critical distinction to ensure methodological consistency in both research and clinical settings.

Indexed as

biomechanicsclinical assessmentgaitground reaction forcehemiparesispropulsionrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID42870994
PMCPMC13658132

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.