ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Closing the diagnostic gap in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: red flags, modern imaging, and emerging therapies.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CM) is an increasingly recognized, treatable, and still underdiagnosed cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy in older adults, with a typical diagnostic delay of several years. We conducted a narrative review with a systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase (January 2000 to June 2026) using database-specific controlled vocabulary and free-text terms related to ATTR cardiomyopathy, clinical red flags, bone scintigraphy, monoclonal protein testing, cardiac magnetic resonance, tafamidis, acoramidis, vutrisiran, and emerging TTR-directed therapies. Two authors screened titles and abstracts, resolved disagreements by consensus, and prioritized multicenter cohorts, clinical trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and guideline or consensus documents. Sixty-two references were included. Three practice points emerge from the literature. First, suspicion should be triggered by red flags such as bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, lumbar spinal stenosis, spontaneous distal biceps tendon rupture, and the combination of increased ventricular wall thickness with low or normal QRS voltage. Second, the contemporary diagnostic pathway requires parallel bone scintigraphy and complete monoclonal protein screening; grade 2-3 myocardial uptake supports non-biopsy diagnosis of ATTR-CM only when monoclonal screening is negative and myocardial uptake is confirmed, preferably by SPECT or SPECT/CT. Third, treatment options now extend beyond tafamidis to acoramidis and vutrisiran, with amyloid-depleting antibodies under active investigation. We propose a pragmatic, resource-stratified diagnostic framework for targeted case-finding rather than population-level screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.