ArticleParasite epidemiology and control2026
Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and practices among livestock farmers regarding ticks and tick-borne diseases in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Parasite epidemiology and control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ticks and tick-borne diseases (TTBDs) remain a major constraint to livestock productivity and a growing public health concern in tropical settings such as Bangladesh. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of livestock farmers regarding TTBDs and to identify associated determinants. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from 5 January to 15 February 2026 among 530 randomly selected livestock farmers across eight districts using a structured questionnaire, with data analyzed through descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and Spearman's correlation. Only 27.7% of respondents demonstrated good knowledge, despite a high positive attitude (85.5%) and moderately satisfactory practices (45.3%). In multivariate analysis, higher education emerged as a strong predictor of good knowledge, with graduates significantly more likely to be knowledgeable compared to those without formal education (AOR = 10.3, 95% CI: 3.33-36.4,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.