ReviewPrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2026
Magnetotherapy application to the pelvic floor dysfunctions: a systematic review.
Review in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic floor dysfunctions, such as stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse, can significantly impact quality of life. In recent years, increasing attention has been given to new rehabilitation treatments like magnetotherapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of magnetotherapy in pelvic floor dysfunctions. We searched PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and it was registered on PROSPERO. We used also PRISMA checklist for the abstracts. In accordance with the PICO we collected six randomised controlled trials published between 2009 and 2025 satisfying the following criteria: adult women diagnosed with pelvic floor disorders; we excluded male participants, animal models, subjects with dermatological conditions affecting the pelvic area. Various magnetotherapy modalities were used. Control groups received placebo, sham treatments, or conventional pelvic floor muscle training. Outcomes were assessed using both objective measures and subjective tools. Despite heterogeneity in protocols and outcome measures, magnetotherapy appears effective in reducing symptoms and improving quality of life. Magnetotherapy offers a promising, non-invasive alternative potentially improving adherence to treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.