ReviewEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026
From smart sensing to adaptive remediation: artificial intelligence and Internet of Things for persistent organic pollutants.
Review in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) remain a major environmental challenge because of their persistence, long-range transport, bioaccumulation, and resistance to degradation. Conventional monitoring and remediation systems provide reliable analytical performance but are largely fragmented, laboratory dependent, and unable to deliver the continuous, predictive, and adaptive management required for complex, dynamic contamination scenarios. Recent literature reports substantial advances in biosensors, Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled sensing, machine learning (ML), and artificial intelligence (AI) for pollutant detection, forecasting, source identification, and remediation optimization. However, these developments often operate separately, with limited coordination between environmental sensing, data analytics, treatment processes, and decision-making. The literature further highlights persistent barriers to field deployment, including limited and geographically heterogeneous datasets, inconsistent sensor performance and calibration, restricted model transferability, insufficient independent validation, uncertainty in AI predictions, and the lack of mature regulatory frameworks for AI-assisted environmental assessment. From our perspective, the next advance in POP management should move beyond isolated AI applications toward integrated, closed-loop AI-IoT architectures that continuously connect sensing, prediction, remediation, and feedback control. Such systems could transform POP management from reactive assessment to proactive and adaptive environmental governance. Future progress will depend on standardized, Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) environmental datasets, explainable and uncertainty-aware AI, robust field validation, and interoperable sensing infrastructures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.