ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Colourimetric LAMP detection of Escherichia coli in bovine milk using a simplified DNA preparation method.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a common cause of bovine mastitis, and rapid detection from milk is important for timely disease management. However, molecular assays such as colourimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) are often limited by laboratory-based DNA extraction. This study evaluated a simplified HotSHOT (HS) DNA preparation method for extracting E. coli DNA from bovine milk and assessed its compatibility with colourimetric LAMP and conventional PCR. Pasteurised bovine milk spiked with E. coli was used for analytical evaluation, and culture‑positive clinical milk samples were tested to assess diagnostic performance. The HS method was compared with five commercial DNA extraction kits and a direct boiling method without centrifugation. Performance was assessed using limit of detection (LOD) expressed as colony-forming units per millilitre. Using the HS method, the LOD was 7.9 × 10⁴ CFU/mL for LAMP and 7.9 × 10³ CFU/mL for PCR. PCR performance of the HS method was comparable to the QIAamp and Norgen commercial kits, while LAMP sensitivity was ten- to a hundred-fold lower than the best kit-based methods. Direct boiling showed markedly reduced sensitivity, with an LOD of 7.9 × 10⁸ CFU/mL. Among 17 culture-confirmed clinical mastitis milk samples positive for E. coli, LAMP detected 15 (88.2%) and PCR detected all 17 (100%). These results show that simplified DNA preparation can support molecular detection of E. coli in bovine milk and provide a practical basis for future development of field-deployable diagnostics in resource-constrained settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.