ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Pressure-Pressure Loop: A Novel Method for Biophysical Characterization of Blood Vessels.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop and evaluate a pressure-only method for localized functional characterization of synthetic vascular models and vascular grafts by capturing their integrated dynamic response and its interaction with stenosis severity.
methodsAn in-vitro closed-loop pulsatile flow system tested seven vascular models and grafts (silicone, latex, ePTFE, Dacron) at 0, 50, and 90% lumen narrowing. Two proximal high-fidelity pressure sensors recorded intraluminal pressure waveforms to construct pressure-pressure loops. Loop behavior was evaluated qualitatively through loop morphology and quantitatively using the slope descriptor (α). Uniaxial tensile testing provided independent Young's modulus measurements.
resultsIncreasing stenosis altered pressure magnitude while characteristic loop patterns remained recognizable across conditions, with severe stenosis modifying specific features without eliminating broader patterns. Silicone models showed broad loops, latex models displayed complex crossing patterns, and vascular grafts exhibited narrow, near-linear loops. Loop morphology and the repeatable slope descriptor (α) were consistent across measurements, together differentiating the integrated, configuration-specific dynamic responses of the tested vascular models and grafts.
conclusionPressure-pressure loop analysis provides a novel pressure-only framework for functional characterization of vascular models and grafts. Combining qualitative loop morphology with a reproducible quantitative slope descriptor, the approach captures complementary features of the integrated dynamic pressure response rather than a single intrinsic material property. The study demonstrates the feasibility of extracting meaningful descriptors from two intraluminal pressure waveforms in-vitro, supporting future validation in native blood vessels and applications in vascular graft design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42875705What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.