ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Self-reported chewing or swallowing problems and episodic memory performance in older Americans: a longitudinal cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Impaired mastication is a plausible modifiable risk factor for dementia, but long-term longitudinal evidence using functional metrics instead of tooth counts is limited. This study investigated the association between self-reported chewing/swallowing problems and cognitive decline trajectories in older adults. Methods: We analyzed repeated NHATS rounds 7-14. The primary analytic sample comprised 8,636 participants contributing 34,571 person-round observations with valid exposure and immediate plus delayed 10-word recall. Raw total recall (0-20) was the primary outcome. Linear mixed models used rounds since each participant's first complete analytic assessment, time-varying exposure, random intercepts and random slopes, and adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, comorbidity count, depressive symptoms, hearing impairment, and vision impairment. Results: At the first complete analytic assessment, 842 participants (9.7%) reported chewing or swallowing problems. In the primary model, the exposure-by-time interaction was -0.035 recall points per follow-up round (95% CI, -0.075 to 0.005; Conclusion: In this analytic NHATS sample, self-reported chewing or swallowing problems were not independently associated with a statistically significant difference in episodic-memory trajectory after sensory and other prespecified adjustment. The item may warrant oral, swallowing, functional, or neurological assessment, but it is not a specific marker of masticatory dysfunction or cognitive risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.