ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The trans-cultural geometry of liberation: convergent topologies across independent soteriological traditions Article I of III: the comparative anatomy of liberation structures.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article demonstrates that diverse soteriological traditions across six civilisational contexts (Hindu, Buddhist, Christian mystical, Islamic Sufi, Kabbalistic Jewish, and Graeco-Roman philosophical) instantiate a shared structural grammar of liberation despite having developed their models within substantially different philosophical, linguistic, and institutional contexts. A five-element template is identified: a conditioned principle (current self), an unconditioned principle (ultimate ground), a perceived gap between them (the structural definition of bondage), a method of resolution (path), and a final stabilised state (liberation). This template resolves into exactly three topological types: closed identity (gap recognised as illusory, endpoint: stillness), open-relational (gap refined and preserved, endpoint: sustained intensity), and disentanglement (gap recognised as natural original condition, endpoint: witness-detachment). The convergence of these three types across traditions constitutes the primary evidence presented. A critical methodological finding is introduced: the Invariance Test, which demonstrates that liberation is characterised not by observable transformation but by its absence: the liberated person continues with their work as before, neither celebrating, advertising, nor restructuring identity around the event. The article refrains from offering a causal hypothesis for the convergence, reserving that analysis for Article III in this series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.