Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876793›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The trans-cultural geometry of liberation: convergent topologies across independent soteriological traditions Article I of III: the comparative anatomy of liberation structures.

Swapan Samanta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Swapan SamantaIndependent Researcher, Kolkata, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article demonstrates that diverse soteriological traditions across six civilisational contexts (Hindu, Buddhist, Christian mystical, Islamic Sufi, Kabbalistic Jewish, and Graeco-Roman philosophical) instantiate a shared structural grammar of liberation despite having developed their models within substantially different philosophical, linguistic, and institutional contexts. A five-element template is identified: a conditioned principle (current self), an unconditioned principle (ultimate ground), a perceived gap between them (the structural definition of bondage), a method of resolution (path), and a final stabilised state (liberation). This template resolves into exactly three topological types: closed identity (gap recognised as illusory, endpoint: stillness), open-relational (gap refined and preserved, endpoint: sustained intensity), and disentanglement (gap recognised as natural original condition, endpoint: witness-detachment). The convergence of these three types across traditions constitutes the primary evidence presented. A critical methodological finding is introduced: the Invariance Test, which demonstrates that liberation is characterised not by observable transformation but by its absence: the liberated person continues with their work as before, neither celebrating, advertising, nor restructuring identity around the event. The article refrains from offering a causal hypothesis for the convergence, reserving that analysis for Article III in this series.

Indexed as

bittul ha-yeshcomparative soteriologyconsciousnesscross-cultural mysticismfanā’Gelassenheitliberation topologymokṣa

Identifiers

PMID42876793
PMCPMC13661509

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.