Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876923›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

Investigation of human defence responses in a virtual reality environment: an EEG study.

Vidisha Maithani, Manish Kumar Asthana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vidisha MaithaniDepartment of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India.
Manish Kumar AsthanaDepartment of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A predatory imminence continuum displays the perceived imminence of threat to visualise the risk to the prey. Most human studies have utilised static paradigms that may lack ecological validity and limit the exploration of defensive behaviours. Therefore, the present study investigates Fight/ Flight defence responses and underlying neural correlates using EEG under varying conditions of threat proximity and escape availability using a virtual reality (VR) environment. The experiment consisted of a desktop VR environment, including training and experimental phases (5 conditions). Conditions 1 to 4, except 5, included a threat avatar. The conditions differed based on threat proximity (distal/ proximal) and participant's escapability (escape/no-escape). Twenty trials were presented, with each condition presented 4 times. Participants responded with a Fight/Flight response to the threat, followed by a 10-s rest scene and a 5-s fixation. A significant difference in reaction time was observed, indicating distinction based on threat proximity and escapability. A heightened Fight response was observed across all conditions. This pattern may reflect the absence of consequences associated with defensive actions compared to real-life scenarios. For the electrophysiological analysis, ERP analysis indicated a significant difference in the Late frontal activity at the F1 electrode across all conditions. This may suggest tentative cognitive processing during the period surrounding defensive response (Fight or Flight) selection and execution. Together, the findings indicate that although the lack of consequences may have promoted the Fight response more in the VR scenarios, the neural responses may have shown differences in cognitive processing.

Indexed as

defence responsefight-or-flightresearch domain criteriathreat imminence continuumvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42876923
PMCPMC13661590

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.