Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42877754›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026

Nurse-perceived workload, staffing, and patient turnover: An analysis of longitudinal routine data.

Michael Ketzer, Sarah N Musy, Christos T Nakas, Michael Simon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael KetzerInstitute of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Switzerland.
Sarah N MusyInstitute of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Switzerland.
Christos T NakasLaboratory of Biometry, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece.
Michael SimonInstitute of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nursing workload is a critical factor in ensuring safe, high-quality patient care and maintaining nurse well-being. While high workload has been linked to adverse outcomes for both patients and staff, its assessment remains challenging. Common approaches rely on activity- or dependency-based measures or professional judgement, yet these often overlook important subjective and contextual factors. Nurse-perceived workload, particularly at the shift level, offers valuable insights but has received limited attention in research and is rarely used to guide staffing decisions. Objective: This retrospective longitudinal study explored nurse-perceived workload on shift level and its associations with nurse staffing, patient comorbidity score and turnover. Design: Retrospective observational study using longitudinal shift-level routine data. Settings: Five internal medicine units in a large Swiss acute care hospital. Participants: 131 registered nurses (RN). Methods: We analysed five years (2015-2019) of routinely collected data from five internal medicine units of a Swiss tertiary hospital. Nurse-perceived workload was documented at the end of each shift using a single-item rating. Staffing system data (e.g., shift assignments, working time) were merged with patient discharge data (e.g., diagnoses, demographics, admission). Descriptive statistics, multilevel logistic regression, and a gradient boosting model were applied. Results: High workload was classified in 9,646 of 42,035 nurse-shift observations (22.9%). The number of incoming patients showed the strongest positive association with high workload perception (OR 1.30; 95% CI: 1.26-1.33). Higher RN staffing relative to expected staffing was associated with lower odds of high workload (OR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.78-0.91). Patient comorbidities also showed a positive association (OR 1.07; 95% CI: 1.06-1.08), as well as the number of outgoing patients (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 1.004-1.04). The gradient boosting model showed limited predictive performance. Conclusions: This study is among the first to investigate nurse-perceived workload using extensive longitudinal routine data. The findings suggest that single-item ratings are a practical means of capturing workload perception at scale. High workload perception was common and was positively associated with patient inflow and comorbidity, while higher staffing levels were associated with lower odds of high workload. These results underscore the potential of integrating subjective workload data into staffing policy and workforce planning to better support nurses and maintain care quality. Registration: not registered. Social media abstract: Nurse workload isn't just personal. It's part of the system: 23% of nurse-shift observations were classified as high workload; odds were higher with admissions, complexity, and lower with better staffing.

Indexed as

InpatientsLongitudinal studiesNursing staffPersonnel staffing and schedulingRoutinely collected health dataWorkload

Identifiers

PMID42877754
PMCPMC13663898

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.