ReviewNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2026
Ketamine and Esketamine in Acute Suicidal Presentations: Evidence, Limits, and a Conceptual Recovery-Enabling Downstaging Framework.
Review in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To synthesize evidence for intravenous racemic ketamine and regulated intranasal esketamine in adults with acute suicidal presentations; distinguish the outcomes these interventions have and have not been shown to change; and place any rapid response within a complete emergency suicide-care pathway. Methods: A narrative review of PubMed/MEDLINE-indexed literature was updated through July 16, 2026. Searches and study selection were performed by Wiesław Jerzy Cubała and Anita Słupska. Priority was given to randomized trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, pivotal ASPIRE publications, current US and European product information, and studies of emergency-department safety planning, lethal-means counseling, and post-discharge care. No formal risk-of-bias assessment or pooled reanalysis was undertaken. Results: Intravenous racemic ketamine has randomized and meta-analytic evidence for rapid, short-term reduction of suicidal ideation in selected adults, with important variation by population, comparator, measure, and follow-up. The evidence does not establish prevention of suicide attempts or deaths. In ASPIRE I and II, regulated intranasal esketamine added to hospitalization, a newly initiated or optimized oral antidepressant, and comprehensive standard care accelerated improvement in depressive symptoms; clinician-rated suicidality improved markedly in both groups and did not consistently separate from placebo plus standard care. Across both evidence streams, a post-dose score cannot substitute for dynamic risk formulation, level-of-care decisions, safety planning, lethal-means restriction, or a confirmed transition of care. Conclusions: Intravenous racemic ketamine may produce a rapid, short-term reduction in suicidal ideation in selected adults, whereas regulated intranasal esketamine has demonstrated accelerated improvement in depressive symptoms in hospitalized patients with major depressive disorder and acute suicidal ideation with intent, without a consistent treatment-specific effect on suicidality. Neither intervention has been shown to prevent suicide attempts or deaths. We propose a conceptual, non-validated recovery-enabling downstaging framework to describe a time-limited movement from high acuity toward a state in which collaboration and definitive treatment become more feasible. The framework is intended to complement, not replace, dynamic risk formulation, safety planning, and disposition assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.