ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2026
Sepsis-associated endothelial dysfunction: clinical phenotypes, biomarkers, bedside evidence, and translational implications.
Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis is a systemic vascular disorder in which endothelial activation, dysfunction, and structural injury contribute to shock, microcirculatory failure, immunothrombosis, and multiorgan dysfunction. Sepsis-associated endotheliopathy is not a uniform process but a dynamic trajectory that evolves from adaptive endothelial activation toward functional disruption, structural injury, and organ-specific vascular failure. In this Review, we propose a phenotype- and trajectory-oriented framework that integrates clinical manifestations, molecular mechanisms, and translational assessment of endothelial dysfunction in sepsis. We focus on four major clinically recognizable modes of endothelial dysfunction that often overlap and evolve over the course of sepsis. We further discuss biology-anchored biomarker panels, bedside physiological surrogates, and serial trajectory-based assessment as complementary approaches for identifying endothelial states, refining risk stratification, and guiding future precision strategies. Finally, we describe implications for biomarker-enriched clinical trials, microvascular-informed resuscitation, and endotype-guided endothelial cell-targeted therapies. Viewing sepsis through the lens of dynamic endotheliopathy provides a framework linking vascular biology to clinically interpretable trajectories and may facilitate the development of personalized approaches to endothelial cell-directed care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.