Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42878983›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2026

Susceptibility Profiles Among Sporothrix brasiliensis Genotypes in the Ongoing Zoonotic Sporotrichosis Epidemic in Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay.

Vanessa Brito de Souza Rabello, Marcus de Melo Teixeira, Fernando Almeida-Silva, Thiago Brasil de Moura Costa, Andrea Reis Bernardes-Engemann, Melissa Orzechowski Xavier, Rodrigo Almeida-Paes, María Cecilia López-Joffre, Cristina Elena Canteros, Lisandra Serra Damasceno and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Vanessa Brito de Souza RabelloLaboratório de Micologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. vanessa.brito@ini.fiocruz.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9318-6240
Marcus de Melo TeixeiraNúcleo de Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3330-3847
Fernando Almeida-SilvaLaboratório de Micologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7378-1990
Thiago Brasil de Moura CostaLaboratório de Micologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2448-3198
Andrea Reis Bernardes-EngemannLaboratório de Micologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4997-8734
Melissa Orzechowski XavierLaboratório de Micologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande (FAMED-FURG), Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3883-0080
Rodrigo Almeida-PaesLaboratório de Micologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6639-6058
María Cecilia López-JoffreLaboratorio Nacional de Referencia Em Micología Clínica, Departamento de Micología, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas INEI-ANLIS " Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán, CABA, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1479-0615
Cristina Elena CanterosLaboratorio Nacional de Referencia Em Micología Clínica, Departamento de Micología, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas INEI-ANLIS " Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán, CABA, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0955-9340
Lisandra Serra DamascenoHospital São José de Doenças Infecciosas (HSJ), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1425-5912
Isabella Dib Ferreira GremiãoLaboratório de Pesquisa Clínica Em Dermatozoonoses Em Animais Domésticos, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8428-7616
José Guillermo Pereira BrunelliCentro de Especialidades Dermatologicas, Ministerio de Salud Pública y Bienestar Social, San Lorenzo, Paraguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9660-4156
Wieland MeyerWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9933-8340
Rosely Maria Zancopé-OliveiraLaboratório de Micologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7619-1921

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 308315/2021-9Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/200.105/2025Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/200.381/2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sporothrix brasiliensis is the predominant etiological agent of sporotrichosis in Brazil and has been progressively expanding its geographic distribution to other countries in South America. The human patients infected with S. brasiliensis usually respond favorably to antifungal therapy. However, therapeutic failure may occur, and management may be particularly challenging in cases of severe disease. We recently reported that at least seven S. brasiliensis genotypes circulate across South America. However, their biological and clinical relevance of this genetic diversity remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigated whether distinct S. brasiliensis genotypes are associated with reduced susceptibility to the main antifungal agents used in the treatment of human and animal sporotrichosis. A total of 92 clinical, veterinary, and environmental S. brasiliensis strains from Brazil, Paraguay and Argentina, genotyping them using a four-gene MLST scheme. Mating type was assessed as well as antifungal susceptibility according to the M38-A2 CLSI guidelines. Results were interpreted according to the established epidemiological cutoff values for S. brasiliensis. The isolates are clustered into six distinct genotypes, with mating type showing a strong association with phylogenetic clades. Non-wild type strains were identified across four haplotypes (H1, H2, H3 and H4) for all antifungal drugs tested. These non-wild type strains were isolated from six distinct Brazilian states and were not associated to a specific genetic background. Nevertheless, non-wild-type strains were predominantly detected among feline isolates, most of which originated from Minas Gerais and belonged to haplotype H2. However, because only a limited number of H2 isolates were included in this study, additional isolates from this haplotype are need to confirm this association. Together, these findings suggest that decreased antifungal susceptibility in S. brasiliensis is not genotype-restricted but may be influenced by host-related or epidemiological factors, particularly in the context of feline sporotrichosis.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsDrug Resistance, FungalEpidemicsSporothrixSporotrichosisZoonosesAnimalsArgentinaBrazilCatsCluster AnalysisGenetic VariationGenotypeHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMultilocus Sequence TypingAntifungal AgentsAntifungal susceptibilityGenetic variabilitySporothrix brasiliensis

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.