Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42879685›Full record

ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2026

Assessing PAH exposure during construction work of railroad switches using creosote-impregnated ties.

Jessika Hagberg, Håkan Westberg, Bo Strandberg, Christian Lindh, Ing-Liss Bryngelsson, Pål Graff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessika HagbergDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Business, Science and Engineering, Örebro University, SE-701 82 Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4128-8226
Håkan WestbergDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Business, Science and Engineering, Örebro University, SE-701 82 Örebro, Sweden.
Bo StrandbergDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden.
Christian LindhDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden.
Ing-Liss BryngelssonDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Örebro University Hospital, SE-701 16 Örebro, Sweden.
Pål GraffDepartment of Chemical and Biological Work Environment, National Institute of Occupational Health, Po Box 5330 Majorstuen, 0304 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4928-617X

Funding

ALFÖrebro University Hospital OLL-550721Region Örebro län
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The toxicological effects of creosote are primarily attributed to exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and related compounds. This study aimed to assess worker exposure by measuring PAHs in the breathing zone using full-shift air samples, urinary concentrations of 1-hydroxypyrene (1-HP), and dermal exposure through a tape stripping technique. Air sampling was conducted during a work shift on Day 4 (Thursday) of the work week, while urine and dermal samples were collected both before and after the shift on the same day. Additional urine samples were collected at the beginning of the week. Measured concentrations of the 16 priority PAHs identified by the US EPA ranged from 120,000 to 280,000 ng/m3 in the breathing zones of workers handling creosote-impregnated ties. Pyrene concentrations on skin surfaces varied from 0.31 to 140 ng/cm2, with the highest concentrations found on palms and calves. Urinary concentrations of 1-HP increased over the course of the week, ranging from 1.9 to 17 µmol/mol creatinine, indicating substantial variation in individual exposure levels. Workers constructing railroad switches with creosote-treated ties showed elevated urinary 1-HP concentrations during the work week, with most exceeding the British biological monitoring guidance value by Day 4. Dermal uptake was identified as the dominant exposure route using a physiologically based toxicokinetic model. Furthermore, pyrene was detected on skin areas covered by protective clothing, indicating that PAHs can penetrate fabric and that secondary exposure from contaminated work clothes is likely. These findings underscore the need for improved preventive measures to reduce dermal exposure.

Indexed as

Air Pollutants, OccupationalConstruction IndustryCreosoteOccupational ExposurePolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsRailroadsEnvironmental MonitoringHumansPyrenesSkinWorking Conditions1-hydroxypyreneAir Pollutants, OccupationalCreosotePolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPyrenes1-hydroxypyrenedermal exposureoccupational exposurepyrenetoxicokinetic model

Identifiers

PMID42879685
PMCPMC13671403

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.