Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42879748›Full record

ReviewJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2026

Leveraging AI and Machine Vision in Telephysiotherapy for Promoting Physical Activity and Reducing Sedentary Behavior: Scoping Review.

Liva Redliha, Guna Semjonova, Liva Araka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liva RedlihaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema Street 16, Riga, LV-1007, Latvia, 371 67 409 219.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4995-2876
Guna SemjonovaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema Street 16, Riga, LV-1007, Latvia, 371 67 409 219.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6554-0716
Liva ArakaFaculty of Medicine, Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4874-7904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Globally, sedentary behavior is a leading risk factor for noncommunicable diseases and premature death. Although telerehabilitation has emerged as a promising method to increase access to physical therapy, the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine vision technologies to objectively monitor and promote physical activity (PA) in home settings remains underexplored. Objective: This scoping review aimed to map and systematize current evidence on the use of AI and machine vision in telephysiotherapy to promote PA and reduce sedentary behavior among healthy adults. Methods: The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology and was reported according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. The PCC (population, concepts, and context) framework defined participants as healthy adults, the concept as AI or machine learning (ML) and machine vision technologies, and the context as remote, home-based telephysiotherapy for objective PA monitoring and/or outcome measurement in interventions aimed at promoting daily activity. Searches were conducted in PubMed, ProQuest, Science Direct, and Wiley Online Library for peer-reviewed primary studies published between 2016 and 2024. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied systematically using the Rayyan platform. Results: Of 7253 initial records, 4 studies met the inclusion criteria. Identified digital solutions comprised ML algorithms (eg, extreme gradient boosting and hybrid classifiers), deep learning models such as graph convolutional networks, video-based center-of-pressure assessments using RGB cameras, and ontology-driven semantic data structuring for personalization. The most frequently studied technologies combined wearable sensors with ML-based behavior change frameworks to assess usability and prototype feasibility. However, none of the studies demonstrated statistically significant improvements in reducing sedentary time or increasing PA levels among participants. The studies predominantly used exploratory or pilot designs, with small sample sizes (range: 10-32 participants) and short follow-up periods (≤12 wk), limiting the strength of the conclusions. Conclusions: Current evidence on the application of AI and machine vision in telephysiotherapy remains scarce and largely exploratory. Although the integration of wearable technology and ML algorithms shows technical feasibility and personalization potential, there is insufficient evidence to confirm improvements in PA outcomes. Future research should prioritize longitudinal clinical trials, ensure the inclusion of diverse populations, and evaluate behavioral outcomes to determine the real-world impact of these technologies in telerehabilitation.

Indexed as

AIartificial intelligencehealthy adultsmachine learningmachine visiontelephysiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42879748
PMCPMC13671600

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.