ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2026
The Duration of the Repeated-Bout Effect After Eccentric Exercise.
Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The duration of the repeated-bout effect following eccentric knee-extensor exercise remains undefined, despite its widespread use in muscle damage research and training. The present study examined how long this protective effect persists in the knee extensors. Forty-eight young men performed two identical bouts of maximal eccentric knee-extensor exercise (5 × 15 repetitions at 60°/s). Four independent groups performed the second bout 3, 6, 9, or 12 weeks after the first. Isometric torque, range of motion (ROM), delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS), muscle thickness, echo intensity, creatine kinase (CK), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were assessed before and 2 and 4 days after each bout. Baseline-adjusted linear mixed-effects models were used to compare responses between bouts, complemented by equivalence testing at 12 weeks. The repeated-bout effect was evident at 3 and 6 weeks across most outcomes and remained detectable at 9 weeks for selected markers. At 12 weeks, no significant differences between bouts were observed at either day 2 or day 4 for any outcome. Exploratory equivalence analyses further indicated that the effect was no longer meaningfully present at these time points for isometric torque, ROM, DOMS, muscle thickness, and echo intensity, whereas the findings for CK and hs-CRP remained inconclusive. Overall, the repeated-bout effect may persist for some outcomes for up to 9 weeks, whereas by 12 weeks no meaningful effect was detectable at the assessed post-exercise time points. This time course can guide the design of muscle damage studies and the scheduling of eccentric training sessions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886157What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.