ArticleApplied health economics and health policy2026
The Challenge of Unit Cost Harmonisation: A French National Reference Unit Cost for Healthcare Services (the MOVIE Project).
Article in Applied health economics and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe lack of standardised unit cost data is a major barrier to the quality and comparability of health economic evaluations in France. Although such evaluations are often required for reimbursement decisions, no national reference cost framework existed outside the hospital sector. The MOVIE project fills this gap by developing the first French reference unit cost framework for 22 healthcare services, using 2021 data from a representative sample of the National Health Data System.
methodsTotal billed amounts, social health insurance reimbursements, and patient out-of-pocket payments were estimated, in line with the collective perspective recommended by French authorities. The methodology was structured into three steps and was repeated for each of the 22 healthcare services. Step 1 consisted of a comprehensive literature review. Step 2 consisted of developing and executing the data query plan using the 2021 ESND database and then defining the statistical unit. Step 3 aimed to verify the consistency of the database with official statistics, estimates derived from the 2% sample that were extrapolated to the national level and compared with annually published macro-level data from official institutions collected in Step 1.
resultsIn 2021, the mean consultation cost was estimated at €39.8 (SD €12.6) for General Practitioners (GPs) and €66.1 (SD €37.1) for specialist physicians. Results show wide variation in unit costs across services, with low variability for allied health care and GP visits, and high variability and strong right-skewness for services such as inpatient care, chemotherapy, and dental care. Mean consultation costs were higher than commonly used tariffs, reflecting additional fees and incentives.
conclusionOverall, this framework improves quality and comparability of economic evaluations and supports better-informed healthcare decision-making in France.
Identifiers
42886456What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.