Evidence mapPaperPMID 7895460Full record

Trial reportDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association1994

Antihyperglycaemic efficacy, response prediction and dose-response relations of treatment with metformin and sulphonylurea, alone and in primary combination.

L S Hermann, B Scherstén, A Melander

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01386671 phase3completedstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Efficacy of Metformin Glycinate vs Metformin Hydrochloride on Metabolic Control and Inflammatory Mediators in Type 2 Diabetes Patients

Ran2014Enrolled203Registered outcomes13Posted comparisons0ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsMetformin glycinate, Metformin hydrochloride
Open the trial in the graph
NCT04943692 phase3suspendedstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Metformin Glycinate Compared to Metformin Hydrochloride on the Progression of Type 2 Diabetes

Ran2021Enrolled500Registered outcomes13Posted comparisons0ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsMetformin glycinate, Metformin hydrochloride
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010 · on this map
    Pooled it
  3. C-peptide in Precision Diabetes Care and Beyond: A Comprehensive Review.Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes · 2026
    Review
  4. Exploring the potential role of C-peptide in type 2 diabetes management.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Practical Review of C-Peptide Testing in Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in the care of patients with diabetes.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2013
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical pharmacokinetics of metformin.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2011 · on this map
    Review
  14. Pharmacogenetics of Anti-Diabetes Drugs.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2010
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Oral antihyperglycemic therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2005
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Modern pharmacotherapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus.Journal of the National Medical Association · 2001
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L S HermannDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Lund University, Sweden.
B Scherstén
A Melander
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The short-term (2-12 weeks) antihyperglycaemic efficacy of metformin (M), glibenclamide (G), and their primary combination (MG) was assessed in a double-blind study including 165 unselected patients with Type 2 diabetes. Patients with diet failure were randomized to M, G or MG. The dose was titrated with a fasting blood glucose concentration (FBG) of < 6.7 mmol l-1 as the target, using at most six dose levels, the first three comprising increasing monotherapy (M or G) or low-dose primary combination (MGL), and the second three add-on therapies (M/G and G/M) and primary combination therapy escalated to high dose (MGH). Success rates were higher on MGL than on monotherapy. The difference in achieving acceptable control (FBG < or = 7.8 mmol 1(-1)) was 70% versus 51% (95% confidence interval 3-36%, p = 0.032). When the drugs were combined, a slightly greater FBG reduction (p = 0.026) was observed, at lower dosage (p = 0.013). The response could not be predicted from body weight, but depended upon initial FBG (p = 0.019) and meal-stimulated C-peptide (p = 0.007). FBG declined progressively with increasing doses of metformin, whereas glibenclamide exerted most of its effect at low dose. Primary combination therapy with metformin and sulphonylurea may be clinically useful.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGlyburideHumansHyperglycemiaMaleMetforminMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseGlyburideMetformin

Identifiers

PMID7895460
OpenAlexW2166640752

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.