ArticleStatistics in medicine1994
Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 146 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Does Glycated Hemoglobin Variability in Type 2 Diabetes Differ Depending on the Diabetes Treatment Threshold Used in the Qatari Population: Implication on Diabetes Complication Risk?
Telephone and Web-based Teen Tobacco Cessation in HMOs
Use of Convalescent Plasma Therapy for COVID-19 Patients With Hypoxia: a Prospective Randomized Trial
Treatment of Covid-19 With Favipiravir Versus Hydroxychloroquine: a Randomized Comparator Trial
Effect of Date Fruit Phytoestrogen on the Glycemic Control of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Who cites it
146 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Time matters for metas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ect vs ketamine for depression incorporating time.Translational psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Endometrial scratch to increase live birth rates in women undergoing first-time in vitro fertilisation: RCT and systematic review.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2022Pooled it
- Ideal vs. real: a systematic review on handling covariates in randomized controlled trials.BMC medical research methodology · 2019Pooled it
- Comparing intravenous and oral proton pump inhibitor therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers following endoscopic management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Pooled it
- Multivariate meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies with multiple cut-points and/or methods of measurement.Statistics in medicine · 2015Pooled it
- Interventions to change the behaviour of health professionals and the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in overweight and obese people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Trial
- Treatment expectations and pain-related outcomes in clinical trials of digital cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth with chronic pain.The journal of pain · 2025Trial
- Comparison of remimazolam-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on hemodynamics during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of anesthesia · 2024Trial
- Supplementation with antioxidant micronutrients in pregnant women with obesity: a randomized controlled trial.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2024Trial
- Acute neural effects of the mood stabiliser lamotrigine on emotional processing in healthy volunteers: a randomised control trial.Translational psychiatry · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Interventions to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Women in the Rural US: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Performance of model-based vs. permutation tests in the HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-termTrials · 2022Trial
- Evaluation of insecticide treated window curtains and water container covers for dengue vector control in a large-scale cluster-randomized trial in Venezuela.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Trial
- Trial
- A roadmap to using randomization in clinical trials.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Trial
- Diffusion of effects of the ASSIST school-based smoking prevention intervention to non-participating family members: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2020Trial
- Effects of dietary methionine and cysteine restriction on plasma biomarkers, serum fibroblast growth factor 21, and adipose tissue gene expression in women with overweight or obesity: a double-blind randomized controlled pilot study.Journal of translational medicine · 2020Trial
- Trial
86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Once the data from a clinical trial are available for analysis it is common practice to carry out 'tests of baseline homogeneity' on prognostic covariates before proceeding to analyse the effects of treatment on outcome variables. It is argued that this practice is philosophically unsound, of no practical value and potentially misleading. Instead it is recommended that prognostic variables be identified in the trial-plan and fitted in an analysis of covariance regardless of their baseline distribution (statistical significance).
Indexed as
Identifiers
7997705What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.