Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8329148›Full record

ReviewDrug safety1993

Adverse effects of exogenous insulin. Clinical features, management and prevention.

A W Patrick, G Williams

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. 'Human' insulin versus animal insulin in people with diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005 · on this map
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A W PatrickDepartment of Medicine, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, England.
G Williams
Royal Liverpool University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insulin has been in therapeutic use for around 70 years, and the range of adverse effects associated with its use is very limited. Insulin allergy and other local cutaneous reactions, which were common with the early insulins, are now rarely seen with highly purified and biosynthetic preparations. By far the most important complication of exogenous insulin is hypoglycaemia, which affects almost all insulin-treated patients and is largely a manifestation of nonphysiological insulin regimens and routes of administration. The problem of hypoglycaemia unawareness is now being increasingly recognised, with onset of severe neuroglycopenia and coma which is not preceded by the characteristic warning symptoms associated with autonomic activation. This can occur with excessively tight glycaemic control, and this situation is usually reversible. More commonly, however, hypoglycaemia unawareness is a chronic problem which is predominantly a feature of long duration of diabetes. Although individual episodes of hypoglycaemic coma can usually be effectively treated with parenteral dextrose or glucagon, management of patients with chronic hypoglycaemia unawareness is a difficult clinical challenge, with limited therapeutic options. In the past few years, there has been concern that the use of human insulin preparations may predispose to hypoglycaemia unawareness. The evidence for and against this is discussed, although at present it is difficult to draw any absolutely firm conclusions.

Indexed as

Drug HypersensitivityFemaleHumansHypoglycemiaInsulinLipodystrophyMalePrediabetic StateRisk FactorsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID8329148
OpenAlexW2045682700

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.